Blog

For the first time since 2022, the IRS is changing standard mileage rates in the middle of the tax year. If you track business, medical or moving miles, this matters. Starting July 1, 2026, the numbers go up, and your recordkeeping needs to get more precise.

What Changed and Why

The IRS bumped the business mileage rate from 72.5 cents to 76 cents per mile for travel on or after July 1, 2026. Medical and moving rates rose from 20.5 cents to 23.5 cents. The charitable rate stays put at 14 cents, where it has been stuck since 1998.

The trigger was fuel prices. When the IRS set the original 2026 rates back in December, gas was averaging about $2.89 per gallon nationally. By mid-July 2026, AAA reported the average had climbed to roughly $3.87, an increase of 34 percent. Much of that spike traces back to the war in Iran and uncertainty around oil production and shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.

The last time the IRS made a midyear adjustment was 2022, after Russia invaded Ukraine and gas prices surged past $5 per gallon in some markets.

Two Sets of Rates for One Year

This creates a split year for mileage calculations. Miles driven from January 1 through June 30 use the original rates. Miles driven on or after July 1 use the revised rates. If you drove 4,000 medical miles before July and another 4,000 after, you would calculate them separately: $820 for the first half at 20.5 cents, $940 for the second half at 23.5 cents.

The same logic applies to employer reimbursements. The new rates kick in only when both the expense and the reimbursement occur on or after July 1. Employers running accountable plans should review their policies to make sure they are applying the correct rate based on when the travel happened and when the payment goes out.

Why the Rates Differ by Category

The business rate is higher because it accounts for both fixed and variable costs of operating a vehicle: depreciation, insurance, maintenance, tires, gas and oil. Medical and moving rates cover only variable costs, which is why they sit lower.

The charitable rate is a different animal entirely. Congress set it by statute, and it has not budged in nearly three decades. Adjusted for inflation, 14 cents from 1998 would be closer to 29 cents today.

Who Can Actually Use These Rates

Here is where it gets narrower than many taxpayers expect. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminated the deduction for unreimbursed employee business expenses starting in 2018, and the One Big Beautiful Bill Act made that change permanent. Most employees cannot write off business mileage whether their employer reimburses them or not.

Moving expense deductions are similarly limited. Only active duty military members moving under orders for a permanent change of station qualify, along with certain intelligence community members under rules effective for 2026.

Charitable mileage requires itemizing, which means it only helps if your total deductions exceed the standard deduction of $16,100 for single filers or $32,200 for married couples filing jointly. Many taxpayers skip it.

Self-employed individuals and business owners get the most benefit from the business rate since they can still deduct qualifying mileage on Schedule C.

Recordkeeping Just Got Harder

Normally, tracking mileage means logging dates, destinations, miles driven, and business purpose. This year, you also need to note which side of July 1 the expense falls on. A mileage app can help, but a notebook or spreadsheet works, too.

If you use a vehicle exclusively for business, beginning and end-of-year odometer readings establish total mileage. Photos can serve as backup. If you mix business and personal use, your records need to clearly separate the two.

Conclusion

Gas prices forced the IRS's hand, and now 2026 has two mileage rate regimes. The math is not complicated, but the documentation requirements are tighter than usual. Know when your miles were driven, keep clean records and make sure your employer's reimbursement policies reflect the July 1 cutoff. The details matter this year more than most.

A county in Michigan was owed about $2,200 in back taxes. To collect it, the government took a home worth close to $200,000, auctioned it for a fraction of that, and called the matter settled. The family is now putting a simple question to the Supreme Court: when the state sells your house over a small debt, does it owe you the real worth of what it took or only whatever the auction happened to fetch?

The Rule that is Already on the Books

Three years ago, the court drew a clear line. Geraldine Tyler, then in her 90s, had let a $2,311 levy on a Minneapolis condo balloon to about $15,000 once penalties and interest stacked up. Hennepin County took the unit, found a buyer at $40,000, and held onto all of it. By any fair reckoning, the $25,000 above her debt was Tyler's money – even though the county walked away with it. Minnesota law blessed that, as did 11 other states and the District of Columbia, plus nine more states under narrower terms.

A unanimous court ended the practice. Chief Justice Roberts wrote that a government can sell property to satisfy a tax debt but cannot help itself to more than the debt is worth. Leftover equity belongs to the owner, and a state cannot dodge that by defining the property interest away.

The Question Tyler Left Hanging

Tyler was tidy because the surplus was undeniable. Subtract a debt near $15,000 from a $40,000 sale, and the leftover is beyond dispute. The justices never had to confront the messier case where the sale price itself is artificially low. If a forced auction brings in far less than a home would fetch on the open market, is that depressed number really the measure of what the owner lost?

That is the gap, and tax auctions are where it opens. Unlike an ordinary listing, these sales draw a thin crowd of investors and speculators, and the government has little reason to chase top dollar. A county could therefore obey Tyler to the letter, hand back every cent of the auction surplus, and still watch most of a family's equity vanish.

How the Pung Family Got Here

Three-and-a-half decades ago, Timothy Scott Pung paid $125,000 for a roughly 3,000-square-foot house in Isabella County, and for years it carried Michigan's Principal Residence Exemption. Scott died in 2004, and his wife in 2008. Their son Marc stayed on, assuming the exemption rolled forward without any new filing. The assessor saw it otherwise and stripped the break retroactively. Marc fought back, and a state tax tribunal agreed no further paperwork had ever been required.

The assessor would not let it go. Over a shortfall of $2,241.93, on a place the county itself pegged at $194,400, the family was thrown out, and the home went under the hammer for $76,000. Nobody disputes that the estate is owed the surplus. The quarrel is how to measure it. Isabella County treats the surplus as the hammer price minus the debt, leaving about $74,000. The estate says the yardstick should be the home's true market value minus the debt, pushing the number toward $194,400. The spread tops $100,000.

Bigger Than One House

The stakes reach far past Michigan. Minnesota alone moved more than 4,300 properties through these sales between 2014 and 2020. Across the 1,200-plus that were family homes, the typical owner lost some 92 percent of the equity above the debt, averaging around $207,000 against bills averaging just $17,000. In the nation's capital, a veteran with dementia lost a $200,000 home over $133.88.

There is a second front, too. The estate contends the foreclosure worked as an excessive fine barred by the Eighth Amendment, a theory the lower court waved off as ordinary tax collection but one that Justices Gorsuch and Jackson have flagged for review.

Argument wrapped on Feb. 25 with a ruling likely any day now. The court has already said the government cannot keep more than it is owed. Now it must decide whether that shield covers only the cash left after the gavel, or the equity that vanished before.

What This Case Is Actually About

This Got Real on April 30

Expats Had It Especially Rough

You Need to File a Protective Claim

A Few Limitations to Know About

Conclusion

Artificial intelligence is driving an unprecedented surge in data center construction. Developers, private equity sponsors and their tax advisors are navigating a complicated web of questions that touch everything from ownership structure to site selection to power sourcing. Get the early decisions wrong and the tax consequences can follow a project for years.

Why REITs Have Become the Structure of Choice

Private equity has increasingly turned to real estate investment trusts when backing data center projects. Structure a REIT correctly, and you sidestep corporate-level taxation entirely. Foreign investors get an even better deal. Sovereign wealth funds and foreign pension funds can participate without any obligation to file U.S. tax returns. Data centers, with their heavy real estate footprint, slot into the REIT framework more naturally than many other asset classes.

That said, the fit is not seamless. Related party rent rules create traps for the unwary. Public pension funds and sovereign wealth funds need to confirm they do not hold stakes in both a data center REIT and its tenant. Another wrinkle involves equipment. Data centers demand significant upfront investment in personal property that may not count as qualifying REIT assets. The tax code requires that 75 percent of a REIT's total asset value consist of real estate, cash, and government securities at each quarter's close. Developers often must segregate personal property until the REIT builds up enough good assets to clear that hurdle.

The Power and Water Challenge

Reliable power and water access have become one of the toughest operational problems in the industry. Demand is so intense that many developers are generating their own electricity on-site. The tax treatment of these co-located power facilities depends heavily on the energy source and delivery method. Get it wrong, and the generation asset may not qualify for REIT treatment.

Solar photovoltaic systems sit on relatively solid ground under existing guidance. Nuclear and natural gas, which many see as the next wave of data center power, do not. Current rules leave significant uncertainty around whether these sources can work within a REIT structure.

Legislative and Executive Developments

The IRS priority guidance plan for 2025 and 2026 contains no projects aimed squarely at data centers. Regulation section 1.856-10(g), finalized in 2016, includes an example analyzing customized electrical and telecommunications systems in a data center context, but practitioners continue pushing for clearer rules on alternative energy.

Congress may offer relief on the waterfront. In April 2025, Representative Darin LaHood of Illinois proposed a new section 48F that would provide a 30 percent credit for qualifying water reuse projects, including on-site recycling systems at data centers. With U.S. data centers projected to consume 33 billion gallons of water by 2028, the bill attracted 21 cosponsors and bipartisan support.

The White House has made its priorities clear as well. The Trump administration's July 2025 AI action plan established a goal of achieving global dominance in artificial intelligence, with infrastructure as one of three pillars. An executive order, issued July 23, 2025, focused specifically on reducing federal regulatory obstacles to data center construction.

Conclusion and OBBBA Incentives Worth Watching

Several provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act benefit data center projects, even though lawmakers did not design them with that sector in mind. The return of 100 percent bonus depreciation under section 168(k) matters enormously for an industry requiring massive capital outlays.

Rural Opportunity Zones sweeten the economics further. Investments in qualified rural opportunity funds now qualify for a 30 percent basis step-up after five years, triple the 10 percent available in standard zones. A special rule targeting improvements to existing structures in rural areas cuts the substantial improvement threshold to 50 percent of adjusted basis, compared to more than 100 percent for non-rural funds.

Developers and investors evaluating new projects will find that entity structure, site selection, and the shifting regulatory environment all interact in ways that directly affect the bottom line. Getting the tax picture right from the start remains essential.

Picture two things happening at the same time. The agency responsible for reviewing your tax return is understaffed and buried under a backlog, and the software that the agency uses to catch filing errors just keeps getting better.

That combination should give any taxpayer pause this season. Not because an audit is necessarily coming, but because if something does go wrong, the window for getting it resolved quickly has shrunk considerably.

The IRS Is Running Lean, But It’s Technology Isn't

The agency lost more than a quarter of its workforce in 2025. The National Taxpayer Advocate's most recent annual report to Congress documented the drop: from roughly 102,000 employees to about 74,000. Those departures, through a mix of voluntary exits and layoffs, spread across nearly every division.

Funding took a hit at the same time. Congress reversed a significant portion of the IRS budget boost approved through the Inflation Reduction Act, pulling back billions earmarked for enforcement and technology investment. A government shutdown that stretched across October and November of last year piled further delays onto an already strained system. The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration confirmed in a January report what tax practitioners were already seeing firsthand: a serious backlog in the processing of amended returns and taxpayer correspondence.

Here's the part that catches people off guard. None of that has slowed the IRS's ability to spot problems on your return. The agency's systems cross-reference what you report against data received independently from employers, brokers, and financial institutions. Artificial intelligence and expanded automation have made error detection faster and more precise, staffing levels notwithstanding.

Fewer people are available to handle problems once they surface. But the technology responsible for finding those problems is running better than ever.

What This Looks Like in Practice

Tax professionals working with real clients are the best window into what this means day to day. Advisors report receiving IRS notices today that are resolving matters dating back to 2023, showing a multi-year lag on what should be routine correspondence. The practical response among preparers has been to tighten processes and leave less to chance.

Some advisors have added specific safeguards, such as obtaining power of attorney to monitor clients' IRS online accounts directly rather than waiting for slow paper notices. Others describe the current environment plainly: the cost of needing to amend a return has gone up, not necessarily in dollars, but in time and uncertainty.

A poll of tax and financial advisors conducted during a recent industry webinar found that every respondent is maintaining at least the same level of care they applied when IRS staffing was at full strength. Nearly half said they are actively raising the bar this season.

What You Should Do Differently

Here are a few practical steps worth taking seriously this year:

• Give your preparer complete and accurate information. Incomplete or inconsistent reporting is where most errors begin, and those errors are exactly what the IRS' matching systems are built to catch.
• If you are claiming something new on your return, ask your preparer to walk you through the basis for it. Understanding what you are filing and why is reasonable.
• Set up an IRS online account at IRS.gov if you haven't already. You can monitor your filing status, review transcripts, and spot potential issues before they become formal notices.
• And if something does go sideways, respond early. Letting a notice sit without a response doesn't slow the IRS down. It just costs you time you don't have.

Conclusion

The agency may be a smaller operation than it was a few years ago. But the part of it designed to find mistakes on your return is still very much running.

Tax season is here, and while the IRS opened its doors for 2025 returns on Jan. 26, with the familiar April 15 deadline intact, this year's filing experience is shaping up to be anything but routine. A perfect storm of workforce cuts, rushed new tax breaks, and strained systems means that getting your return right the first time has never been more important.

A Smaller IRS With a Bigger Job

The numbers tell a sobering story. According to the Taxpayer Advocate, the IRS entered this filing season with 27 percent fewer employees than it had just a year ago. Congressional funding clawbacks combined with the Department of Government Efficiency's push for retirements and reductions have hollowed out the agency's capacity at nearly every level.

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration warned that the IRS could struggle this year, noting that by Dec. 30, 2025, the agency had managed to onboard only two percent of the employees it was authorized to hire for submission processing. The culprits? New hiring procedures imposed by the Trump Administration and delays stemming from last year's record 43-day government shutdown.

What does this mean for you? Automated systems will continue handling straightforward electronic returns efficiently. But anything requiring human attention, whether that's an amended filing, identity verification or a return flagged for errors, will move at a crawl. Phone lines will be even harder to get through than usual, if you can get through at all.

New Deductions, New Confusion

Adding complexity to an already strained system, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that President Trump signed in July introduced a set of temporary tax breaks that took effect retroactively for 2025. These include deductions for tips, overtime, seniors, and car loan interest, all requiring new forms, schedules and guidance that had to be produced in a hurry.

The potential for mistakes is significant, especially for the 45 percent of filers who prepare their own returns. Most 2025 W2 forms will not break out overtime pay separately, leaving taxpayers to figure it out themselves. And despite the political rhetoric around "no tax on Social Security," the reality is a larger deduction for seniors that phases out as income rises. Some recipients may not realize they still need to report their benefits as taxable income.

The SALT cap increase from $10,000 to $40,000 is good news for many, but it also means taxpayers should take a fresh look at whether itemizing now makes more sense than claiming the standard deduction.

Direct Deposit or Prepare to Wait

The IRS is pushing hard for electronic refunds, and for good reason. Most error free, electronically filed returns with direct deposit are processed within 21 days. But if you prefer a paper check or accidentally provide incorrect bank account information, expect a much longer wait with fewer staff available to sort out problems.

Returns sent by mail? Plan on six weeks or more. Amended returns are averaging five months or longer, and the IRS is already working through an elevated backlog from prior years.

The Bottom Line

Accuracy matters more than speed this year. The system still works well for straightforward, completely correct returns, but it is far less forgiving when something goes wrong. If you are uncertain about how to handle one of the new deductions or think you might be missing documentation, filing for an automatic extension is a smarter move than submitting a return with errors.

File electronically. Double-check every entry. Use direct deposit. And if your situation is at all complicated, seek out a tax professional who can help you navigate a filing season where the margin for error has never been thinner.

After a whirlwind 2025 that produced what may be the largest tax bill in American history, the coming year looks dramatically different. Tax policy experts are predicting a legislative standstill, a turbulent tax filing season, and lingering questions about how new provisions will work when put into practice.

A Year of Legislative Gridlock

The forecast for 2026 tax legislation is bleak. With Republicans clinging to an impossibly thin House majority of just 218 or 219 seats following recent resignations, passing any significant bills will be extraordinarily difficult. Every single Republican vote would be needed to advance legislation through reconciliation, and as 2025 demonstrated, keeping the caucus unified is no small feat.

While there has been discussion about a potential second reconciliation bill, most observers view this as wishful thinking. If such a bill were to materialize, it would likely focus on technical corrections to lingering Tax Cuts and Jobs Act issues and problems that emerged from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. One notable concern involves accelerated research credits that did not deliver the benefits lawmakers intended because of unexpected interactions with the corporate alternative minimum tax.

The more pressing concern will simply be keeping the government running. A January deadline looms to avoid another shutdown and, given the contentious relationship between House Republicans and Democrats throughout 2025, even basic funding bills face uncertain prospects. With midterm elections consuming attention in the second half of the year, legislative bandwidth for tax policy will be virtually nonexistent.

A Rough Road Ahead for Taxpayers

The 2026 tax filing season is shaping up to be challenging. The IRS has experienced unprecedented upheaval, losing somewhere between 20 percent and 25 percent of its workforce through a combination of voluntary resignations and reductions in force. Many of these departures came from enforcement divisions, though customer service will also feel the impact.

Leadership instability has compounded these problems. The agency cycled through roughly seven commissioners or acting commissioners in 2025 alone. Former Congressman Billy Long was confirmed as commissioner but lasted less than two months before departing under unclear circumstances. The Treasury Secretary has since taken direct oversight of the agency, and an IRS CEO position was created for the first time in the agency's history. No new commissioner nominee has been put forward, and there is currently no Senate-confirmed chief counsel either.

For taxpayers who need more than basic return processing, this means longer wait times, fewer answered phone calls, and potential delays. Those filing straightforward W-2 returns seeking refunds will likely fare better than individuals or businesses with complicated situations requiring IRS assistance. Audit rates will decline intentionally, as the current administration has committed to scaling back the enforcement emphasis of the Biden years.

The Justice Department's Tax Division also has been gutted, losing many qualified litigators who previously maintained an exceptional track record against large taxpayers in court. This erosion of enforcement capability may not immediately move voluntary compliance numbers, but continued cuts will eventually catch up with the system.

Unresolved International Questions

The relationship between U.S. tax policy and the global minimum tax framework under Pillar 2 remains unsettled. Republicans declined to include a retaliatory tax provision known as section 899 in last year's legislation based on an agreement with G20 nations. If that agreement unravels, there may be pressure to revisit retaliatory measures, though passing such legislation with current House margins seems unlikely.

American companies operating internationally could face pressure in foreign jurisdictions if the United States fails to align with Pillar 2 requirements. While many in Washington believe the international minimum tax framework will collapse, the reality on the ground suggests otherwise, and this disconnect might force future legislative action.

Conclusion

The bottom line for 2026: expect a holding pattern on major tax legislation and brace for a difficult filing season as an understaffed and unsettled IRS works to implement last year's massive changes.

American parents now have access to a completely new savings tool designed to give children a financial foundation for the future. Established through The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, these accounts carry the name of the current president and come with a unique set of rules that the IRS has just begun to clarify.

Who Can Open One?

Any minor holding a Social Security number who has not yet turned 18 by Dec. 31 of the current year meets the eligibility criteria. Getting started requires an authorized adult, typically a parent or legal guardian, to submit an application to the Treasury Department. Once processed, the government establishes the child's account.

Free Money for Newborns

Families welcoming babies during a specific four-year window stand to benefit the most. American citizens born anytime from the start of 2025 through the end of 2028 qualify for a $1,000 federal deposit through a pilot initiative. This starter contribution sits outside all annual limits, meaning it will not reduce how much others can add later.

Billionaire Backing Adds More

Tech titan Michael Dell and his wife, Susan, have pledged $6.25 billion to boost these accounts further. Their generosity will provide an extra $250 to the first 25 million children meeting specific requirements. Kids must be no older than 10 and reside in areas where the median household income is under $150,000. Dell, who runs Dell Technologies as chairman and CEO, ranks 10th among America's wealthiest individuals with a fortune estimated at $148.9 billion.

How Much Can Be Contributed Each Year?

The law caps annual contributions at $5,000, though this figure will rise with inflation over time. Grandparents, aunts, uncles, family friends, and parents can all put money in, but every dollar from these sources counts toward that yearly ceiling. Exceed the limit, and you will need to pull the excess back out.

Workplace benefits offer another channel. Companies can deposit as much as $2,500 annually into accounts belonging to workers or their children. While this money does apply toward the $5,000 threshold, employees will not owe taxes on these contributions.

Charitable organizations and government bodies at various levels have permission to fund these accounts through something called qualified general contributions. Unlike personal or employer deposits, this category of funding exists completely outside the annual cap.

Keep in mind that money coming from family members or friends provides no tax break. These contributions use after-tax dollars. Also worth noting: the earliest anyone can start funding these accounts is Independence Day 2026.

Strict Rules Govern Investments

Congress placed tight restrictions on where this money can go. Only mutual funds and ETFs tracking American stock market indexes qualify. These funds cannot employ any leverage strategies, and their annual expense ratios must not exceed one-tenth of one percent.

Accessing the Funds

Until reaching adulthood, account holders face severe limits on touching their money. The rules permit withdrawals only in narrow circumstances: transferring everything to a different Trump Account, correcting over-contributions, or closing the account following the child's death.

Everything changes at 18. From that birthday forward, the account essentially transforms into something resembling a traditional IRA with comparable guidelines around distributions and taxation.

Filing Requirements

Establishing one of these accounts means completing Form 4547, which the IRS titled Trump Account Election. This document accompanies your annual 1040 filing and handles both account setup and pilot program enrollment. The form number itself contains a nod to history, combining 45 and 47 to reflect Trump's elections as both the 45th and 47th commander in chief.

Conclusion and Official Resources

This new savings tool gives families an innovative avenue to save. Taxpayers seeking detailed information can review Notice 2025-68, which the IRS published to address questions about account creation, investment options, contribution types, distribution rules, and reporting obligations. Full regulations remain in development, with proposed rules expected before final versions emerge following public input. The government maintains a dedicated portal at trumpaccounts.gov for ongoing updates.

Tax planning feels like homework nobody wants to do, but here's the reality: real money is sitting on the table. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act changed the rules this year, and most people are still figuring out what matters for their wallets.

Max Out Everything While You Can

Here's something many people miss. Every Dec. 31, workplace retirement accounts basically close their books for the year. That's it, opportunity gone. The limit is $23,500 this year, or $31,000 for those over 50. Also, anyone between 60 and 63 can throw in an extra $11,250 with the new super catch-up provision. That's serious money that could be working harder instead of going to taxes.

HSAs remain the best-kept secret in tax planning. Most people ignore them until someone explains the magic; it's literally the only account where taxes never apply. Not when money goes in, not while it grows, and not when it comes out for medical expenses. Singles can contribute $4,300 and families $8,550, with up until the April 2026 tax deadline to make it happen. Starting in 2026, there's a bonus feature: $150 a month can go toward concierge doctor memberships tax-free.

IRAs deserve attention, too. The contribution limit is $7,000 (or $8,000 for the 50-plus crowd) with that same April deadline. The catch? Income limits and existing workplace plans can complicate things, so checking the rules is important.

Transform Losing Stocks into Tax Wins

Everyone has those regrettable investments. Maybe it was that "sure thing" tech stock or the cryptocurrency experiment that went south. Here's the good news, selling losers before year-end can offset winners for tax purposes. Even better, losses can erase up to $3,000 of regular income. Whatever doesn't get used rolls forward indefinitely, like store credit that never expires.

Play the Charity Deduction Game Smart

The standard deduction has increased yet again, standing at $15,000 for singles and $30,000 for married couples. Most people won't beat that with itemized deductions, but there's a clever workaround. By bunching several years of charitable giving into 2025, taxpayers can itemize this year and claim the standard deduction in future years. It's like buying in bulk for tax benefits.

Timing matters because 2026 brings stingier charity rules. Only donations exceeding 0.5 percent of income will count, and high earners face a 35 percent cap. Anyone feeling generous should probably act this year.

Control the Income Timeline

Freelancers and business owners hold the cards on payment timing. That December invoice could easily become January income with a quick conversation. Even employees sometimes have flexibility with bonuses through understanding employers or HR departments. The trick is knowing whether next year's tax situation will be better or worse.

The Roth Conversion Opportunity

With permanently lower tax rates now locked in, converting traditional retirement funds into Roth accounts makes increasing sense. Yes, taxes are due on the conversion amount today, but then everything grows tax-free forever. Smart planners often execute these moves during lower-income years, like between jobs or early in retirement.

Navigate Required Withdrawals Carefully

Anyone who's 73 or older must withdraw from retirement accounts by Dec. 31. No exceptions, no excuses. The penalties for forgetting are harsh. First-timers get a choice, either take it now or wait until April. But waiting means two withdrawals hit in 2026, potentially pushing income into higher tax brackets. It's worth doing the math.

The Charity Strategy Nobody Mentions

After age 70½, a powerful option opens up. You can send up to $108,000 directly from an IRA to charity. This qualified charitable distribution satisfies required withdrawals without adding to taxable income. Married couples can each do this, potentially moving $216,000 to charity while avoiding taxes entirely. For those already charitably inclined, missing this opportunity is literally giving money to the IRS instead of chosen causes.

Take Action Before Time Runs Out

Smart taxpayers are running projections comparing 2025 and 2026 tax scenarios right now. They're scanning investment accounts for tax-loss harvesting opportunities. They're accelerating charitable plans into 2025 before the rules tighten. They're smoothing income across tax years where possible.

Nobody gets excited about tax planning, but a few hours of attention before year-end could save thousands of dollars. Good tax professionals pay for themselves many times over, especially in years with rule changes like this one.

America's housing crisis has reached a breaking point. With median home prices soaring past $400,000, the National Association of Home Builders reports that 60 percent of U.S. households can't even afford a $300,000 home. The math has become impossible for most American families.

While we often blame high mortgage rates, restrictive zoning laws and rising construction costs for the housing shortage, there's another culprit hiding in plain sight: a decades-old tax rule that's trapping millions of homeowners in houses they'd rather leave.

The $500,000 Problem

When Congress overhauled capital gains taxes on home sales in 1997, they created what seemed like a generous benefit: homeowners could exclude up to $250,000 in profits from taxes ($500,000 for married couples) when selling their primary residence. This replaced a complex system of rollovers and age-based exemptions with something simpler and cleaner.

But Congress made one critical mistake – they never adjusted these limits for inflation or housing price growth.

Nearly three decades later, these same dollar amounts remain frozen in time, even as home values have skyrocketed. According to new research from Moody's Analytics, if the exclusion had kept pace with home prices, it would now stand at $885,000 for singles and $1,775,000 for couples. Even adjusting for general inflation alone would double today's limits.

The Senior Squeeze

This outdated tax rule hits empty-nesters particularly hard. Consider this: nearly 6 million households headed by seniors live in homes larger than 2,500 square feet. Many would gladly downsize to something more manageable, but selling could trigger six-figure tax bills on homes they've owned for decades.

The result? They stay put, waiting until death when their heirs can inherit the property with a stepped-up basis that erases all capital gains. Meanwhile, these oversized homes remain off the market, unavailable to growing families who desperately need the space.

Moody's Analytics estimates these “overhoused” seniors spend $3,000 to $5,000 more annually on maintenance, utilities and property taxes than they would in smaller homes – adding up to $20 billion to 30 billion in unnecessary costs nationwide each year.

An Unexpected Burden on the Middle Class

Surprisingly, this tax burden doesn't primarily affect the wealthy. Middle-class homeowners in expensive markets like California and Massachusetts face steep tax bills despite modest incomes. Widows face their own challenges, having just two years after a spouse's death to sell while maintaining the full $500,000 exclusion (though they do receive a partial step-up in basis on their late spouse's share).

An IRS study revealed a startling fact: 20 percent to 25 percent of capital gains taxes collected under current rules come from filers earning less than $20,000 annually. Meanwhile, wealthier homeowners often have the resources and flexibility to structure sales strategically, minimizing their tax exposure.

The Housing Market Ripple Effect

This tax trap creates a cascade of problems. Young families remain stuck in starter homes. First-time buyers face even fiercer competition for limited inventory. Labor mobility suffers as workers can't relocate to areas with better job opportunities. The entire housing ecosystem becomes frozen.

The shortage is stark: monthly active listings only climbed back above 1 million in May, according to realtor.com. Before the pandemic, that number hadn't dropped below that threshold since at least 2016.

Solutions on the Table

Congress is considering two approaches to break this logjam. One would be to double the current exclusions and index them to inflation going forward. The more radical proposal would eliminate the cap entirely.

The Double-Edged Sword

Any change comes with risks. Moody's Analytics warns that while updating these limits could unlock hundreds of thousands of homes and boost inventory, it might also intensify competition at the lower end of the market as downsizing seniors compete with first-time buyers for the same properties. It could also make housing an even more attractive tax shelter, which would ultimately drive prices higher.

The Path Forward

The paradox is clear: raising or eliminating the capital gains exclusion could provide immediate relief to millions of homeowners trapped by tax considerations. It could inject a much-needed supply into a starved market. But without careful implementation, it could just as easily fuel another round of price increases, leaving affordability as elusive as ever.

The IRS has released draft Schedule 1-A, introducing four new temporary deductions within the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. If you are wondering what the new form looks like and how the calculations work, read on as we explore each below.

Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI)

It is important to note that all four deductions require calculating your MAGI first, which determines eligibility and phaseout amounts for each deduction.

The Four New Deductions and How the Calculations Work

These deductions are all referred to on the schedule by their colloquial names, for example: “No Tax on Tips,” “No Tax on Overtime” and “No Tax on Car Loan Interest.” The sole exception, however, is popularly referred to as the “No Tax on Social Security” provision, which is called the “Enhanced Deduction for Seniors” on the form.

1. Tips Deduction

• Maximum: $25,000 annually
• Eligibility: Must receive qualified tips in customarily tipped occupations
• Phaseout: Begins at $150,000 MAGI ($300,000 joint filers)
• Rate: $100 reduction per $1,000 over threshold
• Requirements: Valid Social Security number; married couples must file jointly

2. Overtime Deduction

• Maximum: $12,500 single ($25,000 joint filers)
• Eligibility: Only the premium portion of overtime pay (the "half" of time-and-a-half)
• Phaseout: Same as tips deduction – begins at $150,000 MAGI
• Rate: $100 reduction per $1,000 over threshold

3. Car Interest Deduction

• Maximum: $10,000 annually
• Eligibility: Interest on loans for new vehicles under 14,000 pounds and assembled in the United States
• Phaseout: Begins at $100,000 MAGI ($200,000 joint filers)
• Rate: $200 reduction per $1,000 over threshold
• Requirements: Must provide VIN; loan must originate after Dec. 31, 2024

4. Enhanced Deduction for Seniors

• Amount: $6,000 fixed deduction
• Eligibility: All taxpayers (replaces “No Tax on Social Security” promise)
• Phaseout: Begins at $75,000 MAGI ($150,000 joint filers)
• Rate: 6 percent reduction of excess income over threshold

Key Points to Remember

• All deductions are available whether you itemize or take the standard deduction
• All require valid Social Security numbers
• Married couples must file jointly to claim these benefits
• Income limits mean higher earners receive reduced or no benefits
• These are deductions, not exclusions – income is still reportable for state/local taxes

Final Steps

After you have calculated everything applicable for the four possible deductions, you will enter the total on the new line 13b on Form 1040. The total amount of the deductions entered here is removed from your income prior to calculating your tax. Remember, these are deductions and not credits, so they only reduce your taxable income and are not a direct reduction in your tax due.

You can see an example of the new draft Form 1040 illustrating this below.

Screenshot of new Form 1040

Conclusion and Draft from Status – and IRS Warning

The above provides guidance to taxpayers and professionals on how both the deductions calculations work and flow through Form 1040. The IRS warns, however, that the forms and instructions currently released are in draft form at this point. Before any forms or instructions can be released in their final state, they need to be approved by the OMB. It is not unusual for draft releases of instructions and publications to have some changes before their final release, even if only minor.

Required minimum distributions (RMDs) from traditional IRAs and 401(k)s often become a significant tax burden during retirement. As the percentage of your IRA that must be distributed increases each year, many retirees face higher adjusted gross income and increased exposure to stealth taxes. However, with strategic planning, you can transform RMDs from burdens into opportunities.

Timing Your First RMD

The RMD starting age has changed recently: age 72 for those born before 1951, age 73 for those born 1951-1959, and age 75 for those born in 1960 or later. Your first RMD must be taken by April 1 of the year following when you reach the required age.

While you can delay your first RMD until early the following year, most taxpayers should take it in the year they reach the required age. Delaying means you'll take two RMDs in one calendar year – your delayed first RMD plus that year's current RMD – potentially pushing you into higher tax brackets and increasing stealth taxes.

Managing Multiple IRAs

If you own several traditional IRAs, you have valuable flexibility under the aggregation rules. First, calculate the RMD for each IRA separately. Then, you can either take distributions from each IRA individually or combine all RMDs and withdraw the total amount from your IRAs in any ratio you choose, even taking the entire amount from just one account.

This flexibility allows you to rebalance your portfolio, draw down smaller accounts, or meet other financial goals. Just ensure that by December 31, your total distributions equal or exceed the aggregate RMD. Note that inherited IRAs and employer plans like 401(k)s cannot be aggregated and must have their RMDs calculated and taken separately.

Charitable Giving Strategy

One of the most tax-efficient strategies is using qualified charitable distributions (QCDs). If you're over 70½ and make charitable gifts, taking your RMD as a QCD can reduce your taxable income while satisfying the distribution requirement. This strategy often provides better tax benefits than taking a distribution and then making a separate charitable deduction.

Account Structure Optimization

The tax law allows you to consolidate or split IRAs without tax consequences using direct trustee-to-trustee transfers. Some people prefer multiple IRAs for beneficiary planning, different investment strategies or to keep 401(k) rollover money separate. Others find multiple accounts harder to manage and worry about unequal performance affecting beneficiaries differently.

Consider your specific situation: if you have a qualified longevity annuity contract (QLAC) that delays RMDs until age 85, managing it in a separate IRA might be easier.

In-Kind Distributions

You don't need to sell assets to generate cash for RMDs. Instead, you can make in-kind distributions by transferring securities directly from your IRA to a taxable account. This preserves your asset allocation and can be particularly advantageous when assets have temporarily declined in value.

With in-kind distributions, the asset's value on the distribution date becomes your new tax basis. If you believe a depressed asset will recover, distributing it allows the ordinary income tax on the current low value while future appreciation becomes tax-advantaged long-term capital gains. This strategy is also helpful for unconventional assets like real estate or small business interests that are difficult to sell in portions.

Distribution Timing and Amount

You can take RMDs anytime during the year. Some prefer monthly distributions for regular cash flow, others take distributions early to ensure compliance, and some wait until year-end to maximize tax deferral and delay estimated tax payments.

Remember that RMDs are minimums – you can always take more. Consider larger distributions in years when your tax rate is unusually low due to higher deductions or lower income. This reduces future RMDs when your tax rate might be higher.

Conclusion

Strategic RMD planning can significantly reduce their tax impact. By understanding timing options, leveraging aggregation rules, using charitable strategies, optimizing account structures, considering in-kind distributions and timing distributions strategically, you can turn required distributions into opportunities for smart tax and retirement planning.

Running a small business often means working with a mix of people: some full-time staff, part-time helpers, seasonal workers or project-based contractors. While this flexibility helps manage costs and workload, it creates a crucial decision point that many business owners underestimate: properly classifying each worker.

The stakes couldn't be higher. Companies like FedEx have paid nearly half a billion dollars for getting this wrong, and even tech giants like Microsoft and Lyft have faced costly legal battles over worker misclassification.

Why Classification Matters More Than You Think

The difference between an employee and an independent contractor goes far beyond semantics; it fundamentally changes your legal and financial obligations.

When someone is your employee, you must:

• Withhold income taxes, Social Security, and Medicare taxes
• Pay the employer portion of Social Security and Medicare taxes
• Potentially provide benefits like health insurance and retirement plans
• Consider offering stock options or other incentive programs
• Pay severance or unemployment compensation when appropriate
• Comply with wage and overtime requirements

When someone is an independent contractor, you:

• Simply pay them for their work
• Issue a 1099-NEC form at year-end
• Have no tax withholding obligations
• Owe no employment benefits
• Face no severance obligations

The Control Test: Your North Star for Classification

The Internal Revenue Service uses one primary principle: control. The more control you exercise over how, when, and where work gets done, the more likely that person is your employee.

Think of it this way: if you're micromanaging the work process, you're probably dealing with an employee. If you're only concerned with the end result, you're likely working with a contractor. The 20 factors identified by the IRS in Revenue Ruling 87-41 can be found in full here.

The IRS Three-Factor Framework

Rather than getting lost in complicated checklists, focus on these three core areas:

1. Behavioral Control – Do you dictate not just what work gets done, but how it's performed? Employees typically receive training, follow company procedures, and work within established systems. Contractors bring their own methods and expertise.

2. Financial Control – Who controls the business aspects of the work? Independent contractors typically:

• Invest in their own tools and equipment
• Handle their own business expenses
• Have multiple clients or income sources
• Set their own rates and payment terms

3. Relationship Type – What does your working relationship look like? Employee relationships typically feature:

• Written employment contracts
• Ongoing work arrangements
• Benefits packages
• Work that's central to your business operations

Beyond Taxes: The Broader Impact

Worker classification affects more than your tax bill. The Department of Labor's 2024 updates to the Fair Labor Standards Act mean misclassification can trigger wage and overtime violations. State labor departments are also cracking down, with some states presuming workers are employees unless proven otherwise.

When Things Go Wrong: Your Options

If you realize you've made a mistake, don't panic. You have several paths forward:

• Get an Official Determination: File Form SS-8 with the IRS for an official ruling on a worker's status. While it takes at least six months, you'll have certainty going forward.
• Claim Safe Harbor Protection: If you had a reasonable basis for your classification and treated similar workers consistently, you may qualify for tax relief under Section 530.
• Use the Voluntary Settlement Program: The IRS Voluntary Classification Settlement Program lets you reclassify workers prospectively while receiving some tax relief.

The Bottom Line

Your worker classification isn't just an administrative detail – it's a fundamental business decision with major financial implications. When in doubt, err on the side of caution or consult with employment law and tax professionals.

The cost of getting expert advice upfront is minimal compared to the potential cost of getting it wrong.

The rise of artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT and Grok has transformed how Americans seek information. From meal planning to complex financial questions, these platforms offer instant answers to virtually any query. But when it comes to U.S. tax advice – especially international tax matters – relying on AI can lead to serious and costly mistakes.

The Allure and Limitations of AI Tax Help

The appeal of AI for tax questions is understandable. However, AI's limitations become glaringly apparent in international tax matters. This specialized field combines extraordinary complexity with constant change, creating a perfect storm that exposes AI's weaknesses. The landscape shifts regularly through regulatory updates, IRS interpretations, and court decisions – changes that AI systems struggle to incorporate in real-time.

Consider the IRS Practice Units, internal training materials for tax examiners that became public in 2020. From January through early May 2025 alone, the IRS released 35 new Practice Units, with 22 addressing intricate international tax topics such as foreign tax credit computations, base erosion anti-abuse tax, and treaty provisions. These rapidly evolving resources represent just one stream of constantly changing tax guidance that AI models could fail to capture, leading to outdated or incomplete advice.

How AI Gets Tax Advice Wrong

AI's accuracy problems stem from its fundamental design. Large language models like those powering ChatGPT and Grok train on vast amounts of text from diverse sources – online forums, books, articles, websites, and public records. This training produces responses that sound authoritative and conversational, but this polish masks significant limitations.

The core issue is what experts call "simplexity" – AI's tendency to oversimplify complex tax law. When AI presents intricate regulations as straightforward concepts, it fundamentally misrepresents the law itself. This problem has already surfaced with the IRS's own Interactive Tax Assistant chatbot.

AI systems also suffer from interpretation errors, reliance on outdated information, and conflation of similar but distinct tax concepts. For instance, an AI might confuse the Foreign Tax Credit with the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion – similar-sounding but entirely different provisions with vastly different implications.

The Real-World Cost of AI Errors

Mistakes in international tax compliance carry severe consequences. The IRS considers international tax enforcement a top priority, and errors in reporting foreign income or assets trigger substantial penalties. A late FBAR or foreign information return like Form 8938 or 5471 carries a $10,000 penalty. Errors involving foreign assets can result in a 40 percent accuracy-related penalty on unpaid taxes.

Importantly, relying on AI advice won't qualify as "reasonable cause" to avoid these penalties. Last year, the U.S. Taxpayer Advocate Service highlighted a Washington Post analysis showing that AI chatbots from major tax preparation companies provided incorrect advice up to 50 percent of the time on complex questions. Beyond financial penalties, taxpayers face the stress of audits and the time-consuming burden of correcting mistakes.

Why Human Expertise Remains Essential

While AI continues to advance, it currently falls far short of replacing human expertise in international tax matters. Experienced tax professionals bring irreplaceable skills that algorithms cannot match. They stay current on evolving IRS guidance, monitor treaty updates, and analyze new case law. Most importantly, they apply professional judgment to each unique situation.

International tax planning rarely follows a one-size-fits-all approach. Professionals provide strategic thinking and contextual analysis that optimize outcomes for specific circumstances. They understand when exceptions apply, how different rules interact, and what documentation requirements must be met. These nuanced judgments remain beyond AI's current capabilities.

Conclusion

This doesn't mean AI has no role in tax planning. It can serve as a useful starting point for understanding basic concepts or generating initial questions to discuss with a professional. However, treating AI as a substitute for qualified tax advice is a risky gamble.

The appeal of instant, free tax guidance is strong, but the cost of getting it wrong can be devastating. Until AI can match the precision, current knowledge, and professional judgment of experienced tax professionals, taxpayers would be wise to view it as a supplement to – not a replacement for – human expertise.

For many high-income earners and those approaching retirement, a Roth IRA conversion represents a strategic financial move that can significantly impact long-term wealth preservation. This approach allows you to restructure your retirement savings in a way that could potentially reduce your overall tax burden while creating more flexibility in your golden years.

Understanding Roth IRA Conversions

A Roth IRA conversion is when you transfer funds from traditional tax-deferred retirement accounts – such as a 401(k) or Traditional IRA – into a Roth IRA. While this transaction triggers an immediate tax obligation on the converted amount, it eliminates future taxation on both the principal and all investment growth, provided you follow IRS guidelines. The IRS website offers comprehensive information on the specifics of this process.

The primary advantage lies in strategic tax planning: paying taxes now at a potentially lower rate than you might face in the future.

Traditional vs. Roth: Understanding the Tax Timing Difference

When saving for retirement, the choice between traditional and Roth accounts fundamentally comes down to tax timing:

Traditional 401(k): Contributions reduce your current taxable income, increasing your take-home pay today. However, all withdrawals in retirement will be subject to ordinary income taxes, potentially at higher future rates.

Roth 401(k): Contributions are made with after-tax dollars, reducing your current take-home pay. The significant benefit comes later: tax-free withdrawals throughout retirement.

To illustrate, consider a $10,000 contribution while in the 24 percent federal tax bracket:

With a traditional 401(k), your take-home pay only decreases by $7,600 because you save $2,400 in immediate taxes.

With a Roth 401(k), your take-home pay decreases by the full $10,000 as you're paying taxes upfront.

While traditional accounts offer immediate tax relief, Roth accounts provide tax-free income during retirement and important flexibility that extends beyond just avoiding income taxes.

The IRMAA Factor: A Hidden Retirement Expense

One often overlooked aspect of retirement planning is IRMAA – Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount. This Medicare surcharge applies to higher-income retirees, increasing their Medicare Part B and Part D premiums substantially.

For 2025, married couples filing jointly with income exceeding $206,000 could face premium increases of hundreds of dollars monthly. By strategically converting traditional retirement funds to Roth accounts before retirement, you can potentially keep your future taxable income below IRMAA thresholds, avoiding these additional healthcare costs entirely.

The Long-Term Impact: Required Minimum Distributions

Without implementing Roth conversions, retirement accounts can accumulate substantially larger taxable balances. By age 75, Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) from traditional accounts can be three times higher than for those who gradually converted assets to Roth accounts.

These larger RMDs can create cascading financial challenges:

• Pushing income above Medicare IRMAA thresholds
• Significantly increasing Medicare premiums by thousands annually
• Creating higher tax burdens for surviving spouses who must file as single taxpayers

Early Roth conversions – performed strategically during years with stable tax rates – can dramatically reduce future taxable income while creating greater financial flexibility throughout retirement.

Legacy Planning Benefits

Roth IRAs offer substantial advantages for estate planning. The accounts pass tax-free to heirs (provided the five-year holding requirement is met). For surviving spouses, Roth IRAs provide financial security without RMD concerns. When both spouses have passed, beneficiaries inherit completely tax-free income.

Is a Roth Conversion Right for You?

While powerful, Roth conversions aren't universally beneficial. Consider this strategy if:

• You anticipate higher tax rates in your future
• You have several years before RMDs begin (typically at age 73)
• You have sufficient savings to cover the conversion taxes without depleting the retirement accounts themselves.
• You want to minimize potential IRMAA surcharges or tax implications for a surviving spouse.

Conversions tend to be most advantageous when you can maintain a reasonable tax bracket (24 percent or lower) during the conversion process.

Conclusion

When approaching Roth conversions thoughtfully and as part of a comprehensive retirement strategy, you can potentially create more tax-efficient income streams, avoid Medicare premium surcharges, and leave a more valuable legacy for your loved ones.

As tax filing season begins, scammers are ramping up efforts to steal taxpayers' personal information through increasingly sophisticated schemes. Below, we discuss the latest scam, what to look out for in general, and what to do if you suspect something malicious.

New Scam of the Season

The U.S. Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) recently issued an alert about a prevalent scam involving Economic Impact Payments.

In this scheme, taxpayers receive texts claiming they're eligible for a $1,400 Economic Impact Payment, requesting personal information and bank details for deposit. While the IRS is indeed processing some legitimate Recovery Rebate Credit payments from 2021 tax returns, they will never request personal information via text or social media. These legitimate payments will be automatically distributed by late January 2025, either through direct deposit or paper check, with official notification letters sent separately.

Detecting Scam in General

The cybersecurity firm Guardio reports a 77 percent increase in IRS-related spam messages, highlighting how scammers exploit taxpayers' fears of making mistakes on their returns. Common manipulation tactics include urgent messages claiming:

• Tax return errors requiring immediate action to avoid penalties
• Unexpected tax refund eligibility requiring verification
• Account flags demanding immediate information verification to prevent legal action

These fraudulent messages typically contain malicious links designed to steal sensitive information like Social Security numbers, banking details, and payment credentials. They often masquerade as official IRS forms or legitimate tax advisory companies.

Key Warning Signs of Tax Scams:

• Requests for sensitive personal or financial information
• Links to suspicious websites (legitimate government sites end in .gov)
• Misspellings, grammatical errors, or inconsistent formatting
• Fuzzy or distorted official logos
• Initial contact via email, phone, text, or social media instead of postal mail

What to Do if You Receive a Suspicious Message

If you receive a suspicious message, don't engage with it. Never click links or provide personal information to unknown sources. Report potential fraud by forwarding the message to phishing@irs.gov or filing a report with TIGTA. If you're uncertain about correspondence claiming to be from the IRS, verify it by calling 800-829-1040 or visiting IRS.gov. Your online IRS account will display any official notices mailed to you.

If you've accidentally engaged with a scam:

1. Immediately close any suspicious website tabs
2. Change passwords for potentially compromised accounts
3. Contact your bank or credit card provider to monitor for fraudulent activity
4. Report the incident to the IRS and file an identity theft report with the Federal Trade Commission
5. Consider notifying local law enforcement

When searching for tax-related information online, only use official sources like IRS.gov or the official IRS app. Be wary of sponsored ads and search results that might lead to fraudulent websites. Consider bookmarking official sites for quick, secure access.

Conclusion

Remember, the IRS will never initiate contact through email, text, or social media. When in doubt, assume it's a scam and verify through official channels. Keeping your personal information secure requires constant vigilance, especially during tax season when scammers are most active.

The Basics of Tax Reporting in Legal Settlements

When you collect a settlement for a lawsuit, you'll likely also receive a Form 1099 from the IRS. This form serves as a reminder to pay taxes on your settlement; copies are sent to both you and the IRS. These forms match reported income for income tax purposes, making them critical for accurate tax filing.

In lawsuit contexts, two common forms 1099 are issued:

• Form 1099-MISC: This version can include various types of settlement payments, often termed other income
• Form 1099-NEC: Used specifically for non-employee compensation

Understanding the Difference Between Forms

The distinction between these forms is significant. A Form 1099-NEC informs the IRS that taxes for self-employment should be collected in addition to income taxes. This form is appropriate if you were a non-employee contractor suing for unpaid compensation.

However, in cases like wrongful termination or emotional distress claims, you'll want the non-wage portion reported on Form 1099-MISC instead of Form 1099-NEC to avoid unnecessary self-employment taxes. Pay close attention because filing an incorrect form can be difficult to correct later.

Double Reporting: When 100% Becomes 200%

A surprising aspect of legal settlement tax reporting is that defendants often issue forms 1099 totaling 200% of the actual settlement amount.

• The plaintiff receives a 1099 for 100% of the settlement
• The plaintiff’s attorney receives a 1099 for 100% of the settlement

This duplicate reporting occurs because the IRS requires defendants to report the full settlement amount to both parties when payments are made jointly or through the attorney's trust account. This is done because the defendant may not be aware of how the money is ultimately divided between client and attorney.

Legal Fees and Tax Treatment

The U.S. Supreme Court decided in the case Commissioner v. Banks that gross income for a plaintiff typically includes the part of the settlement paid to their attorney as legal fees. This means you might be taxed on money you never actually received.

To address this issue, plaintiffs should understand when they can deduct legal fees:

• Plaintiffs in employment cases, civil rights cases, and most whistleblower cases qualify for deductions
• Legal fees must typically be paid in the same year as the settlement (as in contingent fee arrangements)
• Outside these case types, deducting legal fees becomes much more difficult
• Even in personal physical injury cases, complications arise if punitive damages or interest are awarded

Tax Planning Before Settlement

It’s best to deal with tax reporting before finalizing your settlement agreement. Consider these strategies:

1. Include specific provisions about which forms 1099 are to be issued
2. Specify the recipients, amounts, and even which boxes should be completed on the forms
3. For physical injury cases that should be tax-free, get written commitments about tax reporting
4. Consider separate checks to lawyer and client when appropriate (though this may not fully prevent attribution of legal fees to plaintiffs)

Without express provisions in your settlement agreement regarding tax forms, correcting any errors later becomes extremely difficult.

Tax-Free Settlements

Some settlements can be totally free of taxation, such as cases where compensation is granted as damages for physical injury. In typical injury cases like auto accidents, damages should be tax-free, but only if there are no punitive damages and no interest as part of the settlement.

Even when you believe your settlement qualifies as tax-free, securing written confirmation about tax reporting in your settlement agreement provides important protection.

Conclusion

Understanding the tax implications of your lawsuit settlement before signing an agreement can save significant headaches and potentially reduce your tax burden. Consulting with a tax professional who specializes in legal settlements is advisable for complex cases.

As 2025 unfolds, U.S. tax policy is poised for significant shifts, particularly with a new Republican administration under President Donald Trump. The year ahead will likely see a range of tax reforms, largely driven by the GOP’s objectives and campaign promises. In this article, we’ll explore the major tax policy trends, legislative developments, and administration changes that may shape U.S. tax law in 2025.

The Impact of Supreme Court Decisions

2024 also saw two major Supreme Court decisions with significant tax implications. In the Moore case, the Court ruled narrowly on the issue of wealth taxation, leaving open the possibility of revisiting the question in the future. While wealth tax proposals had gained some traction among Democrats, the Court’s decision, combined with the political climate, suggests that such proposals are unlikely to gain much momentum under the new administration.

The Loper Bright decision, which questioned the deference given to government regulations, could have far-reaching effects on tax policy. The ruling makes it more difficult for agencies like the IRS to issue regulations without clear legislative guidance, potentially leading to more legal challenges to IRS regulations and shifting the balance of power between lawmakers and regulatory agencies.

2025: A New Republican Agenda

With a Republican administration taking office in 2025, tax policy is expected to shift dramatically. President Trump, along with a Republican-controlled Senate and House, will likely push for several key changes to tax law.

One of the primary objectives will be to extend provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) that are set to expire. This includes individual tax cuts, corporate rate reductions and changes to the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap. The extension of other expiring provisions involving lifetime gift and estate tax exemptions, AMT, child tax credits, and the mortgage interest deduction may also be on the table. Additionally, the GOP is expected to explore new tax cuts, with some lawmakers proposing measures like eliminating taxes on tips, which was promoted during Trump’s election campaign.

On the corporate side, there may be discussions about lowering the effective tax rate through credits and incentives rather than direct reductions to the statutory corporate tax rate. There also could be movement on tax expensing for research and development, as well as other measures to incentivize business investment.

Potential Revenue-Raising Measures

Despite the tax cuts expected to dominate the agenda, there may be some revenue-raising measures included in the GOP’s tax proposals. The focus on reducing deficits could lead to efforts to cut some of the green credits in the Inflation Reduction Act, although these cuts are unlikely to raise significant revenue. There also may be attempts to tighten international tax rules from the TCJA to generate more revenue.

President Trump has also proposed replacing individual income taxes with increases in tariffs, implementing a universal 20 percent tariff across the board, and implementing an additional 50 percent tariff on imports from China.

IRS Funding and Administration Changes

Under the new administration, the IRS is expected to face significant cuts, particularly in its enforcement budget. The $80 billion allocated to the agency in recent years, which was intended to improve taxpayer services and combat tax evasion, is likely to be rolled back. Republicans have expressed strong opposition to the IRS’ expanded powers and are expected to push for a reallocation of those funds toward customer service rather than enforcement.

Additionally, the new administration may replace current IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel, who was appointed during the Biden administration. Trump could nominate a new commissioner, and if this happens, it could spark further debates over the direction of the IRS in the coming years.

Conclusion

2025 promises to be a dynamic year for U.S. tax policy, with significant changes expected under the new administration. Key issues to watch include the fate of the TCJA’s expiring provisions, potential new tax cuts, and ongoing debates over IRS funding and regulations. As the administration works to implement its agenda, there will likely be contentious discussions and compromises on Capitol Hill, setting the stage for a new era of tax policy for the United States.